Key result
In vivo PRRSV vaccine replication produces intermediate RFLP patterns in ~7% of field samples.
Why the study?
The stability of RFLP patterns of PRRS vaccine virus and other viral strains during in vivo replication in pigs was unclear.
Does in vivo replication of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus alter its restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) pattern?
Does in vivo replication of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus alter its restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) pattern?
RFLP patterns can distinguish vaccine and field strains of PRRSV, but the vaccine virus RFLP pattern can change to an intermediate pattern as it spreads in a swine population.
Intermediate RFLP patterns from vaccine replication may confound PRRSV strain typing in swine herds; leaves open need for refined surveillance methods.
OBJECTIVE: To determine stability of the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) pattern of a porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome vaccine virus and patterns of other viral strains as they replicate in pigs. SAMPLE POPULATION: Field samples of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and samples from 2 weaned pigs, 2 nursery-age pigs, and 5 gilts experimentally infected with PRRSV. PROCEDURE: PRRSV was isolated from field samples, experimentally infected pigs, or pigs that were in contact with experimentally infected pigs. For each virus, RNA was isolated from infected cells, and RFLP patterns were determined. RESULTS: 61% of field samples had 2-5-2 RFLP patterns characteristic of the vaccine virus, 32% had field virus RFLP patterns, and 7% had intermediate RFLP patterns that indicated a virus with a close relationship to the vaccine virus. Viruses isolated from experimentally infected pigs had no change in RFLP patterns after up to 13 weeks of in vivo replication and transmission to contact pigs. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: RFLP patterns distinguish the vaccine and field strains of PRRSV; however, as the vaccine virus spreads among a swine population, the RFLP pattern can change to a related intermediate pattern. A glycine at residue 151 of open reading frame 5 is another marker for the vaccine virus; this glycine is rapidly lost and eventually replaced with arginine as the vaccine virus replicates in pigs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wesley et al. (1999) studied Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) infection. In vivo replication of PRRSV was evaluated on RFLP patterns of PRRSV. In vivo replication of PRRSV vaccine virus can lead to intermediate RFLP patterns, with field samples showing 61% vaccine-type, 32% field-type, and 7% intermediate patterns.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: