Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A first approach is a primarily theoretical re-examination of the economic base model. It is concluded that only with substantial modification, can it be maintained as a simple model of the interplay between sectors creating regional and urban development. A second approach is to examine empirically the notion that since service activities now show above-average growth and are above-average concentrated in big cities, they pull economic development towards big cities. This is shown not necessarily to be the case, indeed it may be called ‘the structural fallacy’. Shift-share analyses in France and Denmark in the last decades of the twentieth century show that shifts out of the big cities more than counter-balance their structural advantages. However, this is not necessarily the case everywhere or in all periods. A third approach is, using the concepts and findings of the first two, to discuss the role of services in the development of rural areas, small and medium-sized towns, and big cities in Western Europe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sven Illeris (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: