Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: The present study aimed to evaluate pregnant women's opinions on universal screening for COVID-19 during hospital admission.Methods: Between 1 September 2020 and 24 November 2020 in the antenatal ward and labour ward of United Christian Hospital, a self-administrated questionnaire (in Chinese and English) on universal screening was distributed to all obstetric patients upon admission (or after delivery).Results: Of 600 questionnaires distributed, 520 (86.7%) were returned.Of these, 11 were excluded owing to missing answers and 509 were included in analysis.All respondents had negative results of COVID-19.98.4% of the women agreed with universal screening for all obstetric patients on admission.69.0%, 73.9%, and 72.1% of women considered that a negative COVID-19 result would have a positive effect on their own care, their baby's care, and their family, respectively, with 82.1% feeling more ready to breastfeed and 84.9% feeling more at ease to look after their babies after delivery.97.2% thought that all staff in the obstetric ward should have COVID-19 screening.A logistic regression model showed that women with tertiary education or above (odds ratio [OR]=2.361,p<0.001) and with emergency admission (rather than elective admission) [OR=1.686,p=0.018] were more likely to believe that a negative screening result would have positive effects on her care, whereas women with tertiary education or above (OR=3.615,p<0.001) were more likely to believe that a negative result would have a positive impact on their baby's care.Conclusion: Universal screening for COVID-19 on admission is well supported by obstetric patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chow et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: