Key result
Impaired LV GLS is linked to high ventricular filling pressure post-MI, independent of LVEF.
Absolute Event Rate: 19.7% vs 15.5%
p-value: p=0.008
In a porcine model of myocardial infarction, impaired global longitudinal strain was associated with elevated left ventricular filling pressure independent of LVEF, highlighting its potential as a prognostic marker.
GLS may refine post-MI filling pressure assessment beyond LVEF; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND Left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) has emerged as a significant prognostic marker in patients after myocardial infarction (MI). Although elevated LV filling pressure after MI might alter GLS, direct evidence for this is lacking. This study aimed to clarify the association between GLS and LV filling pressure in a large animal MI model. METHODS A total of 104 Yorkshire pigs underwent both echocardiographic and hemodynamic assessments 1 to 4 weeks after induction of large anterior MI. GLS was measured in the apical four-chamber view using a semi-automated speckle-tracking software. LV pressure-volume relationship was invasively measured using a high-fidelity pressure-volume catheter. GLS >-14% was considered impaired. RESULTS Compared to pigs with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) >40% and preserved GLS (n=29), those with LVEF >40% and impaired GLS (n=37) and those with LVEF ≤40% (n=38) had significantly higher LV end-diastolic pressure (15.5±5.5 vs. 19.7±5.8 and 19.6±6.6 mmHg; P=0.008 and P=0.026, respectively) and higher LV mean diastolic pressure (7.1±2.9 vs. 10.4±4.5 and 11.1±5.4 mmHg; P=0.013 and P=0.002, respectively). GLS was modestly correlated with tau (r=0.21, P=0.039) and slope of LV end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship (r=0.43, P<0.001). Impaired GLS was associated with higher LV end-diastolic and mean diastolic pressures after adjusting for LVEF and baseline characteristics (P=0.026 and P=0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Impaired GLS assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography was associated with elevated LV filling pressure after MI. GLS has an incremental diagnostic value for detecting elevated LV filling pressure and may be particularly useful for evaluating post-MI patients with preserved LVEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aikawa et al. (2020) studied Myocardial infarction (n=104). Impaired left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS >-14%) vs. Preserved GLS was evaluated on LV end-diastolic pressure (p=0.008). Impaired global longitudinal strain was associated with significantly higher LV end-diastolic pressure (19.7 vs 15.5 mmHg, P=0.008) in pigs with preserved LVEF after myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: