Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Many therapies involving varying degrees of complexity have been used to treat acne scars, but none is considered the gold standard treatment. OBJECTIVE: A comparative evaluation of 88% phenol and 90% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) applied using the chemical reconstruction of skin scars (CROSS) technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A nonrandomized, single-blinded self-controlled clinical trial was conducted among patients with ice pick-type and boxcar-type atrophic acne scars. Using 88% phenol on the left hemiface and 90% TCA on the right hemiface was adopted as the standard practice of the CROSS technique. The dermatological quality of life index (DLQI) questionnaire, acne scar grading scale Échelle d´Evaluation Clinique des Cicatrices d'Acne (ECCA), and evaluation of improvement were performed pretreatment and post-treatment. RESULTS: Regarding ECCA, significant differences were found in pretreatment and post-treatment (p < .001). Regarding tolerance to pain, it was found that the discomfort felt with 90% TCA was significantly less than that felt with 88% phenol (p = .020). Regarding the quality of life measured with the DLQI, the results showed that the mean score in post-treatment assessment was significantly lower than that in the pretreatment assessment (p < .05). Hypochromia and enlargement scar were only seen after the use of 90% TCA. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the efficacy of both TCA and phenol for treating such scars, with less severe complications from the use of phenol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dalpizzol et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: