Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reaction of [MoLL1(η-MeC2R)A][BF4][R = Me, Et, or Pri; L = L1= P(OMe)3; LL1= Ph2PCHCHPPh2; L = PEt3, L1= CO; A =η-C5H5 or η5-C9H7] with NaBH4 or K[BHBus3] in tetrahydrofuran affords the anti-substituted η3-allyl complexes [MoLL1(η3-CH2CHCHR)A]. The structure of the complex [Mo(CO)(PEt3)(η3-anti-1-MeC3H4)(η5-C9H7)] was established by single-crystal X-ray crystallography. Crystals are monoclinic, space group P21/n with a= 10.038(2), b= 17.291(4), c= 11.346(3)Å, β= 95.000(18)°, and Z= 4. Using 3 887 reflections measured on a four-circle diffractometer at room temperature, the structure has been refined to R 0.0344, R′ 0.0459. The molecule adopts an exo-conformation with the methyl substituent of the allyl ligand in an anti-position cis to the carbonyl ligand. Treatment of the complex [Mo{P(OMe)3}2(η-HC2But)(η-C5H5)][BF4] with NaBH4 or K[BHBus3] in the presence of excess P(OMe)3 gives the σ-vinyl complex [Mo{P(OMe)3}3{σ-(E)–CHCHBut}(η-C5H5)], structurally identified by n.m.r, spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography. Crystals are monoclinic, space group P21/c with a= 11.731(3), b= 12.796(3), c= 18.827(4)Å, β= 92.33(2)°, and Z= 4. Using 7 437 intensity data, measured at 195 K on a four-circle diffractometer, the structure has been refined to residuals R= 0.026, R′= 0.026. The molecule shows typical four-legged ‘piano-stool’ geometry with the vinyl group adopting E stereochemistry, σ-bonded to the molybdenum atom. In contrast, the reaction of K[BHBus3] with [Mo{P(OMe)3}2(η-HC2Pri)(η-C5H5)][BF4] in tetrahydrofuran at low temperature affords the allyl complex [Mo{P(OMe)3}2(η3-1,1-Me2C3H3)(η-C5H5)]. The n.m.r. spectra and mechanism of formation of these compounds are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allen et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: