Key result
Optimal early arrival and thrombolysis for MI avert an estimated ~27% of 28-day deaths.
Why the study?
The potential benefits of early hospital care and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction were not fully understood in a community-based setting including out-of-hospital deaths.
Does early hospital arrival and optimal use of thrombolysis reduce 28-day mortality in patients under 70 years with myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=1,029)
Does early hospital arrival and optimal use of thrombolysis reduce 28-day mortality in patients under 70 years with myocardial infarction?
Early hospital arrival and optimal use of thrombolysis could potentially avert up to 27% of deaths following myocardial infarction in a community setting.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change prehospital MI protocols; leaves open whether modeled benefits translate to real-world mortality reductions.
The potential benefits of early hospital care in the event of myocardial infarction were investigated in a community-based study of all suspected cases of heart attack among people aged under 70 years in the Hunter Region of New South Wales. Between August 1984 and December 1985 acute care data were collected for 1029 cardiovascular events classified as definite myocardial infarction or sudden coronary death; 516 (50%) resulted in death within 28 days from the onset of symptoms and 325 of these deaths (63%) occurred outside hospital. Of 703 people who are known to have reached hospital alive 205 (29%) did so more than four hours after the onset of symptoms. At the time of the study fewer than 1% of patients received streptokinase. To estimate the potential benefits of increased medical care an optimistic scenario was considered in which patients who arrived at hospital more than four hours after the onset of symptoms received medical attention earlier and all eligible patients received thrombolysis. Based on the results of the Second International Study of Infarct Survival (ISIS-2), if streptokinase and aspirin had been used 14% of deaths would have been averted. If, in addition, patients had arrived at hospital earlier and received optimal benefit from thrombolysis another 13% of deaths could have been avoided. These results provide a broader perspective of the potential benefits of improved medical care than can be obtained from hospital-based studies that deal only with those heart attack victims who survive long enough to reach hospital alive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heller et al. (1990) conducted an observational in Myocardial infarction or sudden coronary death (n=1,029). Early hospital arrival and thrombolysis vs. Late arrival and no thrombolysis was evaluated on Death within 28 days from the onset of symptoms. Modeling optimal early hospital arrival and thrombolysis in a community cohort of myocardial infarction patients suggested that 27% of deaths within 28 days could have been averted.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: