Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We recall a recently introduced mixed formulation of thin film magnetization problems for type-II superconductors written in terms of two variables, the electric field and the magnetization function, see [Electric field formulation for thin film magnetization problems, Supercond. Sci. Technol.25 (2012) 104002]. A finite element approximation, [Formula: see text], based on this mixed formulation, involving the lowest-order Raviart–Thomas element for approximating the electric field, was also introduced in [Electric field formulation for thin film magnetization problems, Supercond. Sci. Technol.25 (2012) 104002]. Here h, τ are the spatial and temporal discretization parameters, and [Formula: see text] with p-1 the value of power in the current–voltage relation characterizing the superconducting material. In this paper, we establish well-posedness of [Formula: see text], and prove convergence of the unique solution of [Formula: see text] to a solution of the power law model ( Q r ), for a fixed r > 1, as h, τ → 0. In addition, we prove convergence of a solution of ( Q r ) to a solution of the critical state model (Q), as r → 1. Hence, we prove existence of solutions to ( Q r ), for a fixed r > 1, and (Q). Finally, numerical experiments are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barrett et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: