Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The interactions of Os 4, Os 5, and Os 5 C clusters with various sites of a MgO(001) support were investigated theoretically with the aid of a scalar-relativistic density functional cluster model method. Adsorption geometries of C 4 v clusters centered above a magnesium cation and the Os atoms oriented either to the nearest surface oxygen anions (A) or between them (B) were considered. The influence of surface V s and V s 2 - defects on the adsorption of the clusters was also investigated. The calculated base Os−Os distances in supported Os 5 and Os 5 C square-pyramidal clusters are at most 0.1 Å longer (2.5−2.6 Å) than the values calculated for the corresponding free osmium clusters but about 0.4 Å (or more) shorter than the values determined by EXAFS spectroscopy for MgO-powder-supported clusters formed by decarbonylation of [Os 5 C(CO) 14 ] 2 - and shown to retain the Os 5 C frame. The experimental Os−Os distances characterizing the supported clusters are close to the experimental and calculated bond lengths for coordinatively saturated osmium carbonyl clusters; this result favors the suggestion that the supported clusters characterized by EXAFS spectroscopy were not entirely ligand-free. Calculated interaction strengths of the osmium clusters with the MgO(001) support range from nonbonding (defect-free site B when the basal Os atoms are aligned between the nearest O anions) to very weak (0.6 eV for Os 5 C at defect-free site A when the basal Os atoms are aligned with the nearest O anions) to weak (∼2 eV for pure Os clusters at defect-free site A) to rather strong (∼9 eV for V s defect site A). The models reported here are inferred to be too simplified to capture all the pertinent structural details of MgO-powder-supported osmium clusters, but they are sufficient to indicate a significant role of defect sites in the adsorption of supported osmium clusters and, we infer, other transition metal clusters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goellner et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: