BACKGROUND: The most frequently used methods for measuring global DNA methylation are based on two different principles: the use of methylation-sensitive restriction endonucleases followed by analysis of the obtained fragments, or the hydrolysis of genomic DNA followed by specific detection and quantification of the 5-methylcytosine content. We aimed to compare two different methods for evaluation of global DNA methylation: the cytosine extension assay after enzymatic digestion of DNA (Cyt-Ext), and a recently described method using liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry after DNA hydrolysis (LC-MS/MS). METHODS: Both approaches were applied to evaluate global DNA methylation in leukocyte DNA from 96 healthy subjects. Calf thymus and pBR322 DNAs were used as hyper- and hypo-methylated references, respectively. RESULTS: Using the Cyt-Ext method, the DNA from healthy individuals showed radiolabel incorporation of 11,312±1600 Dpm/μg DNA, while the LC-MS/MS method showed 4.55±0.1% methylation. Results are shown as mean±SD. The analysis of hypo- and hyper-methylated references showed that both methods are practical for discriminating different levels of methylation. CONCLUSIONS: Cyt-Ext and LC-MS/MS are viable methods in evaluating global DNA methylation status. However, the LC-MS/MS assay allows absolute quantification and displays far superior intra-day precision. Therefore, we consider the later approach to be better for use in global DNA methylation studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rocha et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: