Key result
Minimally invasive ascending aorta replacement shows comparable safety and success to full sternotomy.
Why the study?
Minimally invasive techniques are expanding to complex ascending aorta operations, but these demanding strategies are currently limited to high-volume centres and experienced surgeons.
Do minimally invasive techniques provide comparable safety and success to classic full sternotomy for ascending aorta replacement in selected patients?
Do minimally invasive techniques provide comparable safety and success to classic full sternotomy for ascending aorta replacement in selected patients?
Minimally invasive techniques for ascending aorta replacement are safe and feasible in well-selected patients when performed by experienced surgeons at high-volume centers.
Minimally invasive techniques have gained immense importance in cardiovascular surgery. While minimal access strategies for coronary and mitral valve surgery are already widely accepted and often used as standard approaches, the application of minimally invasive techniques is currently expanded towards more complex operations of the ascending aorta as well. In this new and developing field, various techniques have been established and reported ranging from upper hemisternotomy approaches, which allow even extensive operations of the ascending aorta to be performed through a minimally invasive access to sternal sparing thoracotomy strategies, which completely avoid sternal trauma during ascending aorta replacements. All of these techniques place high demands on patient selection, preoperative planning, and practical surgical implementation. Application of these strategies is currently limited to high-volume centers and highly experienced surgeons. This narrative review gives an overview of the currently available techniques with a special focus on the practical execution as well as the advantages and disadvantages of the currently available techniques. The first results demonstrate the practicability and safety of minimally invasive techniques for replacement of the ascending aorta in a well-selected patient population. With success and complication rates comparable to classic full sternotomy, the proof of concept for minimally invasive replacement of the ascending aorta is now achieved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Helms et al. (2023) conducted a review in Ascending aorta operations. Minimally invasive techniques vs. Classic full sternotomy was evaluated. Minimally invasive techniques for ascending aorta replacement demonstrated practicability and safety, with success and complication rates comparable to classic full sternotomy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: