Predicting academic outcomes is complex and influenced by factors like socioeconomic background, motivation, and learning style. Machine Learning (ML) algorithms have become increasingly important due to their ability to analyze large data volumes and identify prediction patterns. Results show ML’s success in predicting academic performance, though effectiveness varies by dataset, algorithm choice, and training features. There is no consensus on the most effective ML method for predicting student performance with broad applicability. Among the five algorithms evaluated in this study, the Random Forest Classifier emerged as the best model, achieving the highest G-Mean and accuracy of 0.9243 and 85.42% respectively. This model's performance emphasizes the importance of balanced sensitivity and specificity in predicting student academic performance. The empirical review highlights several challenges, including a lack of standardization in performance metrics, limited model generalizability, and potential bias in training data. It also notes the impact of individual and environmental factors on academic performance, emphasizing the role of instructors and policymakers in improving educational outcomes. The study provides insights into current trends in using ML algorithms for academic predictions, identifying conceptual, methodological, analytical, and ethical gaps. These gaps affect the validity and reliability of research, underscoring the need to address them for informed decision-making and improved learning outcomes. Keywords: Machine Learning Algorithms, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, Academic Performance DOI: 10.7176/CEIS/15-1-09 Publication date: September 30 th 2024
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2024 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: