Key result
POCUS learning curves for detecting pulmonary B-lines vary by anatomical site and image quality.
Why the study?
Operator-dependent point of care ultrasound requires methods to establish individual benchmarks and monitor the learning process.
Can LC-CUSUM and CUSUM control charts effectively establish and monitor the proficiency of physicians in detecting pulmonary B-lines with POCUS?
Case Report (n=53)
Blinded interpretation
No
Can LC-CUSUM and CUSUM control charts effectively establish and monitor the proficiency of physicians in detecting pulmonary B-lines with POCUS?
LC-CUSUM and CUSUM control charts are useful graphical tools for real-time monitoring of POCUS training and highlighting the impact of image quality on the learning process.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LC-CUSUM may benchmark POCUS B-line proficiency; leaves open whether it improves training outcomes or diagnostic performance.
Objective: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is a widely used clinical tool. This operator-dependent technique requires methods to establish individual benchmarks and to monitor the learning process. We present the use of the learning curve standard cumulative summation (LC-CUSUM) and CUSUM control charts to establish and monitor, respectively, the proficiency of a physician to detect pulmonary B-lines with POCUS. Materials and Methods: A training course for general practitioners was conducted to detect plasma leakage using POCUS. The trainees and an expert radiologist identified the number of pulmonary B-lines in the POCUS images of 53 hospitalized patients. The interpretation of one trainee was compared to that of the expert radiologist using LC-CUSUM and CUSUM considering image quality and anatomical site. Results and Discussion: We found that image quality was better in the apices than the bases of the lungs. The trainee learning curve differed by anatomical site and the results of LC-CUSUM and CUSUM differed when only high-quality (first scenario) or all images (second scenario) were included in the analysis. Conclusion: The LC-CUSUM and CUSUM control charts were useful to evaluate the learning curve in this case and to identify image quality as an important factor in the evaluation process. They warrant further study as graphical tools for real-time monitoring of POCUS training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perilla et al. (2023) conducted a case report in Plasma leakage / Pulmonary B-lines (n=53). Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) training vs. Expert radiologist interpretation was evaluated on Proficiency in detecting pulmonary B-lines assessed via LC-CUSUM and CUSUM control charts. The LC-CUSUM and CUSUM control charts showed that the trainee's learning curve for detecting pulmonary B-lines with POCUS varied by anatomical site and was highly dependent on image quality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: