Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Total bacterial numbers at the most highly contaminated sites on lamb carcases (in the crutch region and adjacent to the abdominal incision) were significantly reduced to log 10 3.3/cm 2 when spray washed with unchlorinated water at 80°C and to log 10 2.8 when water at 80°C containing 450 μg/ml chlorine was used, whereas numbers on carcases which were cloth cleaned or spray washed with water at 10°C remained at approximately log 10 4.0. During refrigerated storage, however, carcases treated by all methods developed similar numbers of bacteria and had the same storage life, evidently because spray washing did not affect numbers of bacteria on the diaphragm. Although initial numbers of bacteria at this site were low (log 10 2.9), their numbers, and also the amount of slime, increased more rapidly there than at other sites. In addition, spray washing did not significantly affect numbers of Pseudomonas spp or Brochothrix thermosphacta , which accounted for <1% of the microflora after slaughter at each site but whose numbers were between log 10 6.1 and 7.5/cm 2 when carcases were rejected as spoiled.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kelly et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: