Relationship of anabolic status and phase and rate of growth to priorities for protein and fat deposition in steers.

The effects of anabolic implants, growth phase (growing vs finishing) and rate of growth on the priorities for protein and fat deposition were determined in yearling cattle. Santa Gertrudis crossbred yearling steers weighing 290 kg were individually fed diets varying in forage and grain content and either not implanted (n = 16) or implanted (90-d intervals) with Ralgro (n = 13) or Synovex-S (n = 12) implants. The cattle were fed toward a similar expected final empty BW (455 kg). Initial and interim empty body composition was measured via deuterium oxide dilution; final composition was determined by carcass specific gravity. During a 100-d growing phase, rates of protein gain were increased (P < .12) to 118 and 131 g/d from 98 g/d for Ralgro and Synovex vs nonimplanted cattle, respectively. Concurrently, the fraction of protein in empty body growth was increased (P < .09) from 17.5% for controls to 23.8 and 19.7% for Ralgro- and Synovex-implanted steers, respectively. This change in protein growth occurred concomitant with mobilization of fat and a reduction (P < .04) in fat gain with Ralgro and Synovex implants. During the 136-d finishing phase, protein accretion was 115 and 132 vs 93 g/d for Ralgro- and Synovex-implanted cattle vs nonimplanted cattle; this represented a 24 and 42% increase (P < .03) with Ralgro and Synovex, respectively. In contrast to the growing phase, implants effected a 15% increase (P < .12) in daily empty body gain (from 764 g/d for nonimplanted cattle), where rate of daily fat gain and percentage of protein in gain were similar to controls growing at a much slower rate. The relationships of daily protein gain to daily empty body gain differed (P < .01) with implants vs time. Results from this study indicate that Ralgro was as effective as Synovex in enhancing protein growth earlier in the feeding period, but Synovex was more effective later in the feeding period.