Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 31, 2017PalaeontologyOpen Access

Probabilistic methods surpass parsimony when assessing clade support in phylogenetic analyses of discrete morphological data

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JOJoseph O’ReillyMPMark N. PuttickDPDavide Pisani

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

O’Reilly et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aaa3f94895a99a214830b01https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12330
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effects of missing data on topological inference using a Total Evidence approach2015 · 97 citations
  2. 2Uncertain-tree: discriminating among competing approaches to the phylogenetic analysis of phenotype data2017 · 160 citations
  3. 3A Justification for Reporting the Majority-Rule Consensus Tree in Bayesian Phylogenetics2008 · 110 citations
  4. 4Looking for trees in the forest: summary tree from posterior samples2013 · 212 citations
  5. 5Weighted parsimony outperforms other methods of phylogenetic inference under models appropriate for morphology2017 · 488 citations