Choline chloride–methanesulfonic acid (ChCl–MSA) deep eutectic solvents (DESs) with molar ratios ranging from 1:1 to 1:8 were tailored as superacidic media for the sustainable and selective extraction of lithium and associated valuable metals from a complex carbonate-clay lithium ore. FTIR and Raman spectroscopy revealed that increasing the MSA content transformed the DES structure from a hydrogen-bonded network to a highly ionic environment through strong interactions between chloride anions and sulfonic acid groups (–SO₃H). This structural evolution was confirmed by NMR spectroscopy, which showed a pronounced downfield shift of the integrated –SO₃H/OH resonance from 9.51 ppm (1:1) to 13.31 ppm (1:8), indicating enhanced Brønsted acidity and proton mobility. UV–Vis analysis using Hammett indicators further confirmed the superacidic nature of the DESs, with the Hammett acidity function (H₀) reaching −5.68 for the ChCl–MSA (1:8) system and remaining strongly acidic (H₀ = −4.178) even at 20% water content. The hydrated 80% ChCl–MSA (1:8) + 20% water formulation achieved complete extraction of Li, Na, and Sr from the complex carbonate-clay lithium ore. Although oxalic acid also achieved complete lithium extraction, the ChCl–MSA DES demonstrated superior multi-element extraction, recovering 72% Fe and 88% Mn, while significantly suppressing aluminium dissolution (22%), resulting in a purer leachate. XRD and FTIR analyses revealed that the enhanced extraction performance was associated with extensive disruption of the ore's crystalline structure and a shift of the primary silicate band to 1014.2 cm −1 . These findings demonstrate that tailoring the structure and superacidity of ChCl–MSA DESs provides a sustainable strategy for the selective recovery of lithium and associated valuable metals while suppressing impurity dissolution from complex carbonate-clay lithium ores, offering a promising platform for the valorisation of challenging sedimentary critical raw material resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghaedi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: