In an accumulation game, the Hider secretly distributes his given total wealth h among n locations, while the Searcher picks r locations and confiscates the material placed there. The Hider wins if what is left at the remaining $n-r$ locations is at least 1; otherwise the Searcher wins. Ruckle's conjecture says that an optimal Hider strategy is to put an equal amount $h/k$ at k randomly chosen locations for some k. We extend the work of Kikuta and Ruckle by proving the conjecture for several cases, e.g., $r=2$ or $n-2$; n≤7; $n=2r-1$; h≤2+1/\,(n-r) and n≤2r. The last result uses the Erdős–Ko–Rado theorem. We establish a connection between Ruckle's conjecture and the Hoeffding problem of bounding tail probabilities of sums of random variables.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alpern et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: