Key result
Phenylephrine preserves ~143% of prefibrillation LV function versus epinephrine or control in fibrillating dog hearts.
Why the study?
The beta-adrenergic effects of epinephrine during ventricular fibrillation may be detrimental due to increased myocardial oxygen demand, and it is unclear if selective alpha-adrenergic treatment improves functional recovery.
Does phenylephrine improve functional recovery compared to epinephrine or no drug in isolated dog hearts with ventricular fibrillation?
RCT (n=8)
random order
Does phenylephrine improve functional recovery compared to epinephrine or no drug in isolated dog hearts with ventricular fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 143% vs 72%
p-value: p=< 0.002
In an isolated dog heart model of ventricular fibrillation, phenylephrine preserved left ventricular function better than epinephrine, likely by avoiding the increased oxygen demand and ischemia associated with epinephrine.
Hypothesis-generating for phenylephrine in VF; leaves open clinical translation from this isolated dog heart model.
Epinephrine promotes resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation because of its peripheral vasoconstrictive effects. However, the beta-adrenergic effects of epinephrine may be detrimental because of the stimulation of myocardial oxygen demand. To test whether functional recovery from fibrillation in hearts treated with a selective alphaadrenergic agent is greater than in hearts treated with epinephrine, ventricular fibrillation was induced in eight isolated dog hearts white coronary perfusion pressure was maintained at 30 mm Hg. In random order, epinephrine (5 μg/min), phenylephrine (50 μg/min) or no drug was infused for 5 min. The heart was then defibrillated, the drug infusion stopped and coronary perfusion pressure increased to 100 mm Hg. Coronary blood flow (ml/min per 100 g), arteriovenous oxygen difference (ml O2/dl) and myocardial oxygen consumption (ml O2/min per 100 g) measured after 4 min of ventricular fibrillation were greater with epinephrine (mean ± SD 30.9 ± 11.7, 17.5 ± 1.6 and 5.4 ± 1.9, respectively) than with phenylephrine (24.4 ± 6.0, 15.7 ± 2.6 and 3.8± 1.1, respectively) or no drug (19.8± 5.2, 12.8 ± 1.8 and 2.6 ± 9.7, respectively) (p < 9.05, p < 0.05 and p < 0.05, respectively). The slope of the end-systolic pressure-volume relation 19 min after defibrillation and restoration of normal coronary perfusion pressure was depressed (percent of prefibrillation value) most by epinephrine infusion (72 ± 17%, n = 6), less by no drug infusion (82 ± 12%, n = 4) and was increased after phenykphrine infusion (143 ± 17%, n = 6) (p < 0.002). Volume axis intercepts (Vo) were not different (p = NS). It is concluded that at a coronary perfusion pressure of 30 mm Hg, left ventricular function declines as a consequence of epinephrine administration during ventricular fibrillation and is preserved by the use of pheaylephrne. This epinephrwe-associated impairment likely results from increased oxygen demand and intensification of ischemia, whereas the benefit of phenylephrine seem to be the result of a weak and prolonged positive motropic effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Midei et al. (1990) conducted an RCT in ventricular fibrillation (n=8). Phenylephrine vs. Epinephrine or no drug was evaluated on Slope of the end-systolic pressure-volume relation 19 min after defibrillation (percent of prefibrillation value) (p=< 0.002). Phenylephrine preserved left ventricular function (143% of prefibrillation value) compared to epinephrine (72%) or no drug (82%) in isolated dog hearts with ventricular fibrillation (p<0.002).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: