Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The electrochemical and electrochromic properties of layer‐by‐layer nanoarchitectures of V2O5/chitosan and V2O5 alternated with a blend of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and chitosan have been examined. Using a blend was important, since multilayers of PEO/V2O5 could not be built. The number of electrochemically active V2O5 sites was estimated to be around 3.4 × 10–8 mol cm–2 and 4.4 × 10–8 mol cm–2 for V2O5/chitosan and V2O5/blend, respectively, based on the UV‐vis absorbance attributed to the intervalence V4+→V5+ transfer. A pronounced effect from PEO was observed in the migration/diffusion process, according to cyclic voltammetry and impedance spectroscopy data. The charges injected were 3.29 mC cm–2 and 8.02 mC cm–2 for V2O5/chitosan and V2O5/blend, respectively, at 20 mV s–1. For V2O5/blend, the chronopotentiometric curves show that x in LixV2O5 is about 1.77. Evidence of enhanced ionic transport was provided by the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum, which indicated lithium complexation by PEO and formation of a larger amorphous phase of PEO within the V2O5 matrix. The importance of these results for the production of Li secondary microbatteries and electrochromic devices is discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huguenin et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: