Cian Dorr, Jacob Nebel, and Jake Zuehl have argued that no objects are incomparable in value. One set of arguments they offer depart from a principle they call ‘Strong Monotonicity’, which states that if x is good and y is not good, then x is better than y . In this article, we respond to those arguments, thereby defending the possibility of value incomparability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olle Risberg (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: