Marketing and branding are still regarded as aspects of the business world irrelevant to libraries.Understanding the impact of brand and its evolution on the success of academic librariesnecessitates elucidating the meaning of brand and its contributions to libraries. The lack of acomprehensive definition of marketing and branding and their functions in Iranian libraries alsoconfirms the idea that they are unnecessary in libraries and prevents libraries from moving in theright direction in marketing and branding. To this end, this study aimed to investigate the brandconcept of academic libraries in Iran. This qualitative study employed the grounded theory (GT)methodology based on two of the three coding steps suggested by Strauss and Corbin (1998): “opencoding” and “axial coding”. Twenty experts in fields such as branding, marketing, and librarianship,among others, were interviewed for data collection purposes. Out of these experts, nine were facultymembers, three were researchers, and eight were library employees. Using the MAXQDA software,the content of the interviews was analyzed qualitatively. In addition, the academic library brand wasalso conceptualized with 12 dimensions, including brand identity, brand associations, brandawareness, brand imagery, brand compatibility, brand quality, brand credibility, brand superiority,brand security, brand excitement, behavioral loyalty, and attitudinal attachment. Therefore, it madesense for the brand to focus on providing its customers with the best possible library experience. Thisstudy is the first to define the brand concept for academic libraries in order to shed light on theconcept and its significance in these libraries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sahli et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: