Key result
Extended letermovir beyond 100 days in AHCT with GVHD is linked to ~5% CMV incidence.
Why the study?
Letermovir was only studied through day 100 post-transplantation in its registration trial, and its efficacy for CMV prophylaxis beyond day 100 in patients with GVHD had not been studied.
Does extended duration letermovir prevent clinically significant CMV infections in patients with GVHD after AHCT?
Cohort (n=20)
No
Does extended duration letermovir prevent clinically significant CMV infections in patients with GVHD after AHCT?
Extended duration letermovir beyond 100 days appears effective for preventing clinically significant CMV infections in high-risk AHCT patients with GVHD.
Extended letermovir may reduce CMV events in GVHD after AHCT; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is associated with significant morbidity and mortality after an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (AHCT), and graft versus host disease (GVHD) increases the risk of CMV reactivation. Letermovir is approved for CMV prophylaxis in CMV-seropositive patients, but has only been studied through day 100 post-transplantation in the registration trial. Its efficacy in preventing CMV in patients with GVHD requiring treatment beyond the day 100 milestone has not been studied. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent an AHCT at a single center over a period of 24 months, and identified a cohort of 20 patients who received extended duration of letermovir (beyond 100 days) after the diagnosis of GVHD. The primary end point was the incidence of clinically significant CMV infection, defined as onset of CMV disease or initiation of preemptive therapy with alternative antiviral agents. RESULTS: In this high-risk cohort, only one patient (5%) developed a clinically significant CMV infection, requiring preemptive therapy. No patients developed CMV organ disease. Three additional patients developed CMV viremia of ≥150 IU/mL while on letermovir and after the onset of GVHD, and none required additional treatment. Receipt of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and low CD4 count after the development of GVHD were associated with breakthrough CMV viremia while on extended duration letermovir. CONCLUSIONS: Extended duration letermovir was efficacious in preventing clinically significant CMV infections in patients with GVHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bansal et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in patients with graft versus host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (n=20). Extended duration letermovir was evaluated on Incidence of clinically significant CMV infection, defined as onset of CMV disease or initiation of preemptive therapy with alternative antiviral agents. Extended duration letermovir beyond 100 days in AHCT patients with GVHD was associated with only a 5% incidence of clinically significant CMV infection requiring preemptive therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: