The voluminous, bimodal, Silurian Topsails igneous suite consists mainly of ‘A-type’ peralkaline to slightly peraluminous, hypersohnis to subsolvus granites with subordinate syenite, onzonite and diabase, plus consanguineous basalts and highsilica rhyolites. ∈Nd(T) values from the suite range from −1.5 to +5.4; most granitoid components exhibit positive ∈Nd(T) values (+1.1 to +3.9). Granitoid initial 87Sr/86Sr and most δ18 O values are in the range expected for rocks derived from mantle-like protoliths (0.701–0.706 and +6 to +80/‰). Restricted 207Pb/204Pb variation is accompanied by significant dispersion of 206Pb/204Pb and 208Pb/204Pb. Superficially, petrogenesis by either direct (via fractionation from basalt) or indirect (via melting of juvenile crust) derivation from mantle sources appears plausible. Remelting of the granulitic protolith of Ordovician are-type granitoids can be ruled out, because these rocks exhibit negative ∈Nd(T) and a large range in 207Pb/204Pb. Geochemical and isotopic relationships are most compatible with remelting of hybridized lithospheric mantle generated during arc-continent collision. A genetic link is suggested among collision-related delamination or slab break-off events and emplacement of ‘post-erogenic’ granite suites. A-type granites may recycle previously subducted continental material, and help explain the mass balance noted for modern arcs. However, they need not represent net, new, crustal growth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Whalen et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: