We present the results of a production experiment that explores the realization of voicing in English stop-nasal sequences, a phonological environment with a low functional load. The results imply a separation between primary and secondary voicing cues. Primary cues – aspiration and vocal fold vibration during stop closure – robustly distinguish underlyingly voiced stops from and underlyingly voiceless ones. Meanwhile, secondary cues – vowel duration and stop closure duration – are limited in their use by phonological position or absent entirely. A principal component analysis of the data indicates that all speakers occasionally produce tokens that are ambiguous in voicing cues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Munteanu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: