For decades, the V 2 VI 3 compounds, specifically p-type Bi 2– x Sb x Te 3 and n-type Bi 2 Te 3 –x Se x, have remained the cornerstone of commercial thermoelectric solid-state cooling and power generation near room temperature. However, a long-standing problem in V 2 VI 3 thermoelectrics is that n-type Bi 2 Te 3 –x Se x is inferior in performance to p-type Bi 2– x Sb x Te 3 near room temperature, restricting the device efficiency. In this work, we developed high-performance n-type Bi 2– x Sb x Te 3, a composition long thought to only make good p-type thermoelectrics, to replace the mainstream n-type Bi 2 Te 3 –x Se x . The success arises from the synergy of the following mechanisms: (i) the donorlike effect, which produces excessive conduction electrons in Bi 2 Te 3, is compensated by the antisite defects regulated by Sb alloying; (ii) the conduction band degeneracy increases from 2 for Bi 2 Te 3 and Bi 2 Te 3 –x Se x to 6 for Bi 2– x Sb x Te 3, favoring high Seebeck coefficients; and (iii) the larger mass fluctuation yet smaller electronegativity difference and smaller atomic radius difference between Bi and Sb effectively suppresses the lattice thermal conductivity and retains decent carrier mobility. A state-of-the-art zT of 1.0 near room temperature was attained in hot deformed Bi 1.5 Sb 0.5 Te 3, which is higher than those for most known n-type thermoelectric materials, including commercial Bi 2 Te 3 –x Se x ingots and the popular Mg 3 Sb 2 . Technically, building both the n-leg and p-leg of a thermoelectric module using similar chemical compositions has key advantages in the mechanical strength and the durability of devices. These results attested to the promise of n-type Bi 2– x Sb x Te 3 as a replacement of the mainstream n-type Bi 2 Te 3 –x Se x near room temperature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: