Abstract. 1. The role of the host plant, Acacia karroo , in the population dynamics of the indigenous non‐pest psyllid, Acizzia russellae , was investigated. 2. Population levels of A.russellae in early summer were almost 10 times greater on the regenerative foliage of pruned trees (cut back in spring) than on normal trees. During late summer and winter, populations declined far more slowly on pruned trees, so that very much higher numbers of psyllids were maintained on these trees through to the next spring. This finding, and others, suggest that natural enemies and climate are not major determinants in the population dynamics of this insect under normal conditions in the field. 3. Laboratory measurements of several chemical and physical characteristics of the foliage of pruned and normal trees did not reveal any differences which would account for the observed effects. 4. Measurements of organic nitrogen concentrations in the leaves of normal A. karroo trees in the field showed significant correlations between psyllid numbers and leaf nitrogen, but only during summer in November and January. 5. Psyllid performance in the laboratory (duration of life cycle, egg production, and dry weight of emergent females) was significantly better for psyllids reared on plants containing high amino nitrogen. 6. It is suggested that the availability of quantities of suitably high quality nutrients in the leaves of pruned A. karroo trees explains the “epidemic” population levels achieved by the psyllid on pruned plants. It seems that characteristics of the host plant impose the major limitation on psyllid population growth, which may explain the permanent low endemic population levels of this insect in the field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Webb et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: