The detailed electronic structures and geometries of Si(100) reconstructed surfaces are investigated by a self-consistent calculation with a norm-conserving nonlocal pseudopotential. We concentrate on the dimer model and on (2×{}1), p(2×{}2), and c(4×{}2) reconstructions which are simultaneously detected by recent scanning-tunneling-microscopy measurements. The optimized geometries of asymmetric (2×{}1) and c(4×{}2) systems are reached by minimizing the total energy. Present study shows that the c(4×{}2) system is the most favorable one at absolute zero temperature; moreover, the p(2×{}2) system can also be favored because the total-energy difference between c(4×{}2) and p(2×{}2) systems is relatively small. Both of them are much more stable than (2×{}1) buckled structure. The surface electronic structures of p(2×{}2) and c(4×{}2) systems are analyzed and understood based on the electronic structure of (2×{}1) asymmetric-dimer model. Both the surface band structures and optimized geometries of the present calculation are in reasonably good agreement with experiments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shima et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: