This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
An aluminized coating can improve the high-temperature oxidation resistance of turbine blades, but the inter-diffusion of elements renders the coating’s thickness difficult to achieve in non-destructive testing. As a typical method for coating thickness inspection, X-ray fluorescence mainly includes the fundamental parameter method and the empirical coefficient method. The fundamental parameter method has low accuracy for such complex coatings, while it is difficult to provide sufficient reference samples for the empirical coefficient method. To achieve accurate non-destructive testing of aluminized coating thickness, we analyzed the coating system of aluminized blades, simulated the spectra of reference samples using the open-source software XMI-MSIM, established the mapping between elemental spectral intensity and coating thickness based on partial least squares and back-propagation neural networks, and validated the model with actual samples. The experimental results show that the model’s prediction error based on the back-propagation neural network is 4.45% for the Al-rich layer and 16.89% for the Al-poor layer. Therefore, the model is more suitable for predicting aluminized coating thickness. Furthermore, the Monte Carlo simulation method can provide a new way of thinking for materials that have difficulty in fabricating reference samples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: