Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
// Juan Chen 1,2 , Zhan Wang 3 , Ting Zou 1 , Jiajia Cui 1 , Jiye Yin 1,2 , Wei Zheng 1 , Wuzhong Jiang 3 , Honghao Zhou 1,2 and Zhaoqian Liu 1,2 1 Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Changsha, P. R. China 2 Hunan Province Cooperation Innovation Center for Molecular Target New Drug Study, Hengyang, P. R. China 3 Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, P. R. China Correspondence to: Zhaoqian Liu, email: // Keywords : platinum, NSCLC, chemotherapy response, meta-analysis, polymorphism Received : March 03, 2016 Accepted : May 23, 2016 Published : May 29, 2016 Abstract Published data showed inconsistent results about associations of extensively studied polymorphisms with platinum-based chemotherapy response. Our study aimed to provide reliable conclusions of these associations by detecting genotypes of the SNPs in a larger sample size and summarizing a comprehensive pooled analysis. 13 SNPs in 8 genes were genotyped in 1024 NSCLC patients by SequenomMassARRAY. 39 published studies and our study were included in meta-analysis. Patients with GA or GG genotypes of XRCC1 G1196 had better response than AA genotype carriers (Genotyping study: OR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.53-0.96, P = 0.028; Meta-analysis: OR = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.62-0.89, P = 0.001). Patients carrying CT or TT genotypes of XRCC1 C580T could be more sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy compared to patients with CC genotype (OR = 0.54, 95%CI: 0.37-0.80, P = 0.002). CC genotype of XRCC3 C18067T carriers showed more resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy when compared to those with CT or TT genotypes (OR = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.52-0.91, P = 0.009). Our study indicated that XRCC1 G1196A/ C580T and XRCC3 C18067T should be paid attention for personalized platinum-based chemotherapy in NSCLC patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: