OBJECTIVE:To compare adiposity indexes in physical activity individuals to evaluate behavior, diagnostic ability and to determine which parameter best reflects and diagnoses body fatness.METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed on 100 physically active individuals (59% female).The participants were submitted to anthropometric and body composition evaluation; we measured weight, height, circumferences, blood pressure and bioelectrical impedance analysis.A physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ, short version) was applied, as well as a questionnaire about the possible use of nutritional supplementation.The data were statistically analyzed, with significance level set at p <0.05.RESULTS: Mean age, height, weight and BMI were 24.2 ± 6.65 years, 169.5 ± 8.94 cm, 69.1 ± 14.83 kg and 23.9 ± 4.19 kg/m 2 , respectively, with a significant difference between the genders, except for age.Most of the subjects were in the normal weight range, with a BMI of 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m 2 , and were very active.BMIfat correlated better with body fat for males (r = 0.896) and females (r = 0.935), followed by BMI (0.689 and 0.767, respectively) and BAI (0.590 and 0.718).CONCLUSIONS: Adiposity indexes are viable alternatives for the diagnosis of obesity and should be more explored as fast, practical and low cost measures in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mialich et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: