AIM: To assess the relative efficacy and tolerability of preservative-free latanoprost (T2345) compared with other prostaglandin analogues (PGA) for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension by adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis. METHODS: Randomized, controlled trials evaluating PGA for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension were identified by a systematic literature review in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (up to December 2011) databases. The effect size for each treatment and heterogeneity were assessed by classical pairwise meta-analysis (direct comparisons). Adjusted indirect comparisons were performed by using Bucher method. The main endpoints were intraocular pressure (IOP) measured at 3 months and incidence of hyperemia. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis. No statistically significant differences in IOP at 3 months were seen between T2345 and travoprost [preserved with benzalkonium chloride (BAK), polyquaternium-1 or sofzia], and other BAK-preserved PGA: bimatoprost 0.03%, bimatoprost 0.01%, or latanoprost. T2345 was statistically significantly superior to BAK-tafluprost (mean difference: 0.47 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval, [-1.52;-0.28]). The risk of hyperemia was statistically significantly lower with T2345 than with all the other PGA. CONCLUSIONS: Indirect comparisons never found preservative-free latanoprost (T2345) to be statistically significantly inferior to the other PGA in terms of efficacy on IOP and showed statistically significant superiority over BAK-tafluprost. The risk of hyperemia was statistically significantly lower with T2345 than with all the other PGA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cucherat et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: