This study aimed to investigate the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and height-adjusted resistance (R/H), reactance (Xc/H) and phase angle (PhA). A total of 61 male and 64 female subjects aged over 60 years were recruited from middle Taiwan. The R and Xc were measured using Bodystat Quadscan 4000 at a frequency of 50 kHz. BMD at the whole body, L2–L4 spine, and dual femur neck (DFN), denoted as BMD Total , BMD L2–L4, and BMD DFN , were calculated using a Hologic DXA scanner. The R-Xc graph was used to assess vector shift among different levels of BMD. BMD was positively correlated with Xc/H and negatively correlated with R/H ( p < 0.001). The General Linear Model (GLM) regression results were as follows: BMD Total = 1.473–0.002 R/H + 0.007 Xc/H, r = 0.684; BMD L2–L4 = 1.526–0.002 R/H + 0.012 Xc/H, r = 0.655; BMD DFN = 1.304–0.002 R/H + Xc/H, r = 0.680; p < 0.0001. Distribution of vector in the R-Xc graph was significantly different for different levels of BMD Total , BMD L2–L4 and BMD DFN . R/H and Xc/H were correlated with BMD in the elderly. The linear combination of R/H and Xc/H can effectively predict the BMD of the whole body, spine and proximal femur, indicating that BIVA may be used in clinical and home-use monitoring tool for screening BMD in the elderly in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: