Literature review synthesizes graph neural network models for automated trust evaluation in networked systems, highlighting trade-offs between accuracy and overhead.
The process of quantifying trust considers the factors that affect it, which can be applied to identify malicious behavior, reduce uncertainty, and facilitate decision-making. Traditional trust evaluation methods based on statistics and reasoning, rely heavily on domain knowledge, which limits their practical applications. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are a new Machine Learning (ML) paradigm that can revolutionize the evaluation of trust, by modeling relationships as graphs to simplify relevant data and automating end-to-end evaluation. Thus, a variety of GNN-based trust evaluation models have been developed for different applications. However, there is still a gap in the literature regarding a review on these advances with discussion about remaining challenges. To bridge this gap, we conduct the first review on GNN-based trust evaluation. We first propose a set of criteria in terms of trust-related attributes, correctness, functionality, and overhead. Then, we propose a taxonomy of existing GNN-based trust evaluation models, followed by a review using the proposed criteria to analyze their pros and cons. A quantitative analysis of the recent cutting-edge models is also provided. Based on the review and experimental results, we identify key challenges and suggest future research directions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: