Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study focuses on two different measures to quantify intervention effectiveness for multiple-baseline design data. The influence of 216 design conditions on the estimate of the Tau-U index (with three different variants) and the regression-based effect size is empirically investigated through a Monte Carlo simulation study. Results demonstrate that the magnitude of the within-case variance influences the Tau-U indices the most when the true intervention effect is small relative to large within-case variance. The within-case variance does not systematically influence the regression-based effect size measure. The Critical Tau-U is introduced to help determine if Tau-U estimates indicate evidence in support of an intervention effect and address underlying issues with currently used benchmarks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fingerhut et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: