Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives: To assess the feasibility, predictive value, and user satisfaction of objectively quantifying motor function in Parkinson’s disease (PD) through a tablet-based application (iMotor) using self-administered tests. Methods: PD and healthy controls (HCs) performed finger tapping, hand pronation-supination and reaction time tasks using the iMotor application. Results: Thirty-eight participants (19 with PD and 17 HC) were recruited in the study. PD subjects were 53% male, with a mean age of 67.8 years (8.8), mean disease duration of 6.5 years (4.6), MDS-UPDRS-III score 26.3 (6.7) and H&Y stage 2. In the univariate analysis, most tapping variables were significantly different in PD compared to HC. Tap interval provided the highest predictive ability (90%). In the multivariable logistic regression model reaction time (reaction time test) (p=0.021) and total taps (two-target test) (p=0.026) were associated with PD. A combined model with two-target (total taps and accuracy) and reaction time produced maximum discriminatory performance between HC and PD. The overall accuracy of the combined model was 0.98 (95%CI:0.93-1). iMotor use achieved high rates of patients’ satisfaction as evaluated by a patient satisfaction survey. Conclusion: iMotor accurately differentiated PD subjects from HCs using simple alternating tasks of motor function. The impact on patient care of at-home iMotor-assisted remote monitoring deserves further evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitsi et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: