Key result
Four off-target CV risk factors linked to ~91% higher MACE risk versus 0-1 in T2D.
Why the study?
The association between the number of risk factors at target and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients with albuminuria and no cardiovascular disease was unclear.
Does the number of risk factors at target improve cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients with albuminuria in primary cardiovascular prevention?
Cohort (n=368)
Open-label
Cluster randomized
Yes
Does the number of risk factors at target improve cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients with albuminuria in primary cardiovascular prevention?
Achieving more risk factor targets is associated with better cardiovascular-free survival in patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports multifactorial control in T2DM with albuminuria; extends NID-2 observations but leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Nephropathy in Diabetes type 2 (NID-2) study is an open-label cluster randomized clinical trial that demonstrated that multifactorial intensive treatment reduces Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACEs) and overall mortality versus standard of care in type 2 diabetic subjects with albuminuria and no history of cardiovascular disease. Aim of the present post-hoc analysis of NID- 2 study is to evaluate whether the number of risk factors on target associates with patient outcomes. METHODS: Intervention phase lasted four years and subsequent follow up for survival lasted 10 years. To the aim of this post-hoc analysis, the whole population has been divided into 3 risk groups: 0-1 risk factor (absent/low); 2-3 risk factors (intermediate); 4 risk factors (high). Primary endpoint was a composite of fatal and non-fatal MACEs, the secondary endpoint was all-cause death at the end of the follow-up phase. RESULTS: Absent/low risk group included 166 patients (52.4%), intermediate risk group 128 (40.4%) and high-risk group 23 (7.3%). Cox model showed a significant higher risk of MACE and death in the high-risk group after adjustment for confounding variables, including treatment arm (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.04-3.52, P = 0.038 and 1.96, 95%CI 1.02-3.8, P = 0,045, respectively, vs absent/low risk group). CONCLUSIONS: This post-hoc analysis of the NID-2 trial indicates that the increase in the number of risk factors at target correlates with better cardiovascular-free survival in patients with type 2 diabetes at high CV risk. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00535925. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00535925.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sasso et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes mellitus with albuminuria (n=368). 4 cardiovascular risk factors not at target vs. 0-1 cardiovascular risk factor not at target was evaluated on Composite of fatal and non-fatal MACEs (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.04-3.52, p=0.038). Having 4 cardiovascular risk factors not at target significantly increased the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to having 0-1 risk factor not at target (HR 1.91) in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: