INTRODUCTION: Scoring systems to predict outcomes in pediatric status epilepticus (SE) are limited. We sought to assess usefulness of the END-IT score in pediatric SE. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a retrospective study at a tertiary hospital in New Delhi, India. Children aged 1 month-18 years who presented with seizure for ≥5 min/actively convulsing to emergency were enrolled. END-IT score was calculated and correlated with outcome at discharge using Pediatric Overall Performance Category (POPC) scale, in-hospital mortality, and progression to refractory and super-refractory SE (SRSE). RESULTS: We enrolled 140 children (mean age 5.8 years; 67.1% males). Seven children died and 15 had unfavorable outcomes. The predictive accuracy of END-IT at a cutoff of > 2: for unfavorable outcome (POPC score ≥3) was: sensitivity 0.73 (95% CI: 0.45-0.92), specificity 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89-0.98), PPV 0.61 (95% CI: 0.36-0.83), NPV 0.97 (95% CI: 0.92-0.99), positive likelihood ratio (13.09), F1 score (0.666); for death: sensitivity 0.86 (95% CI: 0.42-0.99), specificity 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85-0.95), PPV 0.33 (95% CI: 0.13-0.59), NPV 0.99 (95% CI: 0.96-1.00), F1 score (0.48); for RSE: sensitivity 0.80 (95%CI: 0.28-0.99), specificity 0.90 (95% CI: 0.83-0.94), PPV 0.22 (95% CI: 0.06-0.48) NPV 0.99 (95% CI: 0.96-1.00), F1 score (0.35); for SRSE: sensitivity 0.67 (95% CI: 0.22-0.96) specificity 0.75 (95% CI: 0.66-0.82), PPV 0.22 (95% CI: 0.06-0.48) NPV 0.98 (95% CI: 0.94-0.99), F1 score (0.33). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate utility of the END-IT score to predict short-term outcomes as well as progression to refractory and SRSE for the first time among children with SE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kapoor et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: