Key result
123I-FP-CIT SPECT projects ~1.8 more potentially beneficial therapy years than clinical judgment while saving costs.
Why the study?
The cost-effectiveness of 123I-FP-CIT SPECT compared to clinical judgment alone for differentiating essential tremor from Parkinson's disease in Italy was not established.
Does 123I-FP-CIT SPECT improve cost-effectiveness and time on beneficial therapy compared to clinical judgment alone in patients with suspected Parkinson's disease or essential tremor?
Does 123I-FP-CIT SPECT improve cost-effectiveness and time on beneficial therapy compared to clinical judgment alone in patients with suspected Parkinson's disease or essential tremor?
Mean Difference: 1.8
Absolute Event Rate: 4.1% vs 2.3%
123I-FP-CIT SPECT is a cost-effective and potentially cost-saving diagnostic tool for differentiating essential tremor from Parkinson's disease in Italy.
May support longer beneficial therapy and cost savings with 123I-FP-CIT SPECT; leaves open confirmation in prospective trials.
Economic evaluation (Italian NHS perspective) modeling (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT (DaTSCAN) compared to clinical judgment alone for differentiating essential tremor (ET) from Parkinson's Disease (PD). A 5-year Markov model was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness of (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT to differentiate ET from PD in patients referred to a movement disorder specialist in Italy. Published data and a double-round, Delphi panel of 12 specialists populated the model. Effectiveness was expressed as the projected Years on potentially beneficial therapy (PBTYs). Costs were expressed in Euros (2005 values). The model suggests that over 5 years, the "current" diagnostic pathway generated an average of 2.3 PBTYs/patient at an estimated cost of 8,864 euros. (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT generated an average of 4.1 PBTYs/patient at an estimated cost of 8,422 euros, which represented an additional 1.8 PBTYs at a cost saving of 442 euros/patient (341 euros when discounted at 5%). The estimated cost-effectiveness of (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT is under 1,000 euros per PBTY gained when the underlying disease prevalence is high (55-70%), and cost-saving at prevalence under 55%. (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT is likely to be regarded as economically advantageous to differentiate ET from PD, increasing time on potentially beneficial therapy at a lower overall cost to the healthcare system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antonini et al. (2008) studied Essential tremor and Parkinson's Disease. 123I-FP-CIT SPECT (DaTSCAN) vs. Clinical judgment alone was evaluated on Projected Years on potentially beneficial therapy (PBTYs) (MD 1.8 PBTYs). 123I-FP-CIT SPECT generated an average of 4.1 potentially beneficial therapy years per patient compared to 2.3 for clinical judgment alone, saving 442 euros per patient over 5 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: