Principal result.Let P{z), Qi(z), ■ ■ ■ , Qr(z) be quadratic forms in the real variables Zi, ■ ■ ■ , zm with real coefficients having the following properties: the form P(z) is positive at each point (z)^(0) at which the forms Qi(z)> ' " ' > Qr(z) vanish simultaneously;for every set of constants 51; • ■ ■ ,Sr, not all zero, the quadratic form SiQi(z)] is indefinite; for every linear subspace L on which the quadratic forms Qi, ■ ■ ■ , Qr do not vanish simultaneously, save at (z) = (0), there is a linear combination SiQi(z) of these forms which is positive definite on L. The principal result given in the present note is given in the following: Theorem i.Under the above hypotheses there exists a set of constants Si, ■ • • , Sr such that the quadratic form P(z, S) = P(z) + S.Qfz) (i=l,---,r) is positive definite in the variables zx, ■ ■ ■ , zm.The last two hypotheses may be dropped when r = \.This theorem was proposed in a somewhat different form by Bliss in 1937 in a seminar on the calculus of variations.It is useful in sufficiency proofs for multiple integral problems.Proofs of the theorem for the case r = 1 were given in the seminar by Albert,% Reid, § McShane and Hestenes, each using a different method.The last two of these proofs have not been published.The proof of Theorem 1 here given is due to McShane and is an immediate extension of the one given by McShane for the case r = \.In the next section Theorem 1 will be applied to the case in which (z) = (xi, ■ ■ ■ , xn, y1; • • • , yn) and the forms Qi, ■ ■ ■ , QT are the two-rowed minors of the wX2-dimensional matrix (xk yk).If n = 2 then r = 1 and Theorem 2 below is an immediate consequence of Theorem 1.If n>2 the further result described in Theorem 3 below is * Presented separately to the Society, by McShane on April 8, 1939, and by M. R.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hestenes et al. (1940) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: