In both Australia and South Africa a state‐sponsored discourse of reconciliation has been deployed as a tool of national integration and state building. This usage has tended to encourage a politics of selective memory that runs contrary to the spirit of reconciliation as recognition of different views of the nation. This article seeks to recover (and promote) a more positive concept of reconciliation by treating it as a discursive, democratic space in which different versions of the national story can be acknowledged and negotiated. The cases of Australia and South Africa are used in a mutually illuminating way to explore what “telling the truth” about the past might mean and how such “truth‐telling” might help restore legitimacy to liberal states confronted with a “broken moral order”.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul Muldoon (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: