This paper examines the predominant perspectives in the literature on the etiology and sustenance of paranormal belief. A sample of 250 participants was used to analyze a series of variables representing the primary theoretical frameworks and develop an integrative model of paranormal belief. The 62% of the subjects held paranormal beliefs. Through linear regression analysis, it was found that subjective paranormal experiences were the best predictor of paranormal belief, with a standardized coefficient of .26 (p<.001), followed by openness to experience (.18, p=.002), unusual experiences (.18, p=.002), religiosity (.14, p=.016), and probabilistic reasoning (-.13, p=.021). These results suggest that paranormal belief is a multicausal phenomenon influenced by diverse factors. Finally, a model is proposed to explain the development and sustenance of paranormal beliefs, highlighting the importance of considering the context and practical implications of holding such beliefs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
José Miguel Pérez Navarro (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: