Key result
AC-rich ribosome binding site spacers yield ~150% higher reporter correlation versus GU-rich spacers.
Why the study?
The activity of ribosome binding sites is poorly predictable due to strong context dependence influenced by local secondary structure.
Absolute Event Rate: 0.714% vs 0.286%
An AC-rich spacer region in the ribosome binding site is associated with low context dependence, providing design criteria to improve programmability in E. coli.
May refine RBS selection for predictable expression; leaves open validation across genetic contexts.
The ribosome binding site (RBS) is a crucial element regulating translation. However, the activity of RBS is poorly predictable, because it is strongly affected by the local possible secondary structure, that is, context dependence. By the Flowseq technique, over 20 000 RBS variants were sorted and sequenced, and the translation of multiple genes under the same RBS was quantitatively characterized to evaluate the context dependence of each RBS variant in E. coli . Two regions, (−7 to −2) and (−17 to −12), of RBS were predicted with a higher possibility to pair with each other to slow down the translation initiation. Associations between phenotypes and the intrinsic factors suspected to affect translation efficiency and context dependence of the RBS, including nucleotide bias at each position, free energy, and conservation, were disentangled. The results showed that translation efficiency was influenced more significantly by conservation of the SD region (−16 to −8), while an AC-rich spacer region (−7 to −1) was associated with low context dependence. We confirmed these characteristics using a series of synthesized RBSs. The average correlation between multiple reporters was significantly higher for RBSs with an AC-rich spacer (0.714) compared with a GU-rich spacer (0.286). Overall, we proposed general design criteria to improve programmability and minimize context dependence of RBS. The characteristics unraveled here can be adapted to other bacteria for fine-tuning target-gene expression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duan et al. (2022) studied this question. AC-rich spacer region vs. GU-rich spacer was evaluated on Average correlation between multiple reporters. Ribosome binding sites with an AC-rich spacer region had a significantly higher average correlation between multiple reporters (0.714) compared with a GU-rich spacer (0.286).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: