Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recent studies showed that deletion of a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subunit gene, Dalpha6 in Drosophila melanogaster results in a strain that is resistant to spinosad, indicating that Dalpha6 is important for the toxic action of this insecticide. To determine if spinosad resistance in house flies was due to a mutation(s) of Mdalpha6 (the orthologue of Dalpha6 from house flies), cDNAs were cloned and characterized from an insecticide-susceptible and a spinosad-resistant strain of the house fly, Musca domestica. The cDNAs contain a 1470-bp open reading frame encoding 490 amino acid residues, 415-bp 5' untranslated region (UTR) and a polymorphic 3'-UTR of approximately 371 bp. The predicted mature protein possesses 468 amino acid residues, has the typical features of a nAChR alpha subunit and is 97% identical to Dalpha6. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis revealed that Mdalpha6 was expressed in the head and the thorax at 1300- and 26-fold higher levels, respectively, than in the abdomen. There was no difference in the expression level of Mdalpha6 between spinosad-resistant and susceptible strains. Ten isoforms arising from alternative splicing were characterized, with isoform II being most common. A-to-I RNA editing was examined and found at 12 sites: editing at 11 of these sites resulted in an amino acid substitution. Mdalpha6 is linked to autosome 1 (spinosad resistance was previously shown to be linked to autosome 1). Single nucleotide polymorphisms, alternative splicing, mRNA levels and A-to-I RNA editing were compared between head and thorax and between insecticide-susceptible and spinosad-resistant strains. These comparisons indicate that Mdalpha6 is not responsible for spinosad resistance in house flies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: