Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To differentiate a symmetric face from an asymmetric face by analyzing a three-dimensional (3D) facial image and plotting the asymmetry index (AI) on a facial symmetry diagram. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Sixty healthy Chinese adults (30 men and 30 women, mean age: 27.7 + 4.9 years old) without any craniofacial deformity were recruited on a voluntary basis from a medical center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 3D facial image of each participant was captured by a GENEX 3D FACE CAM system. Sixteen facial landmarks, as defined by Farkas, were selected on each 3D facial image. The AI was calculated for each landmark. RESULTS: The norm for the AI varied from 0.76 to 2.82. The landmarks located on the upper face had a smaller AI than the landmarks located on the lower face. A facial symmetry diagram was designed according to the mean, one standard deviation, and 2 standard deviations of AI for each landmark. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D facial asymmetry can be documented with AI. The landmarks located on the upper face had a smaller AI than the landmarks located on the lower face. The facial symmetry diagram can identify efficiently the location of asymmetry on a face.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: