Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: to audit risk-factor identification of fallers before and after an education programme and the insertion of a written checklist in medical notes. Risk-factor identification in a dedicated, computerized falls clinic was then examined. METHODS: documentation of risk factors for falls was studied on wards and a self-auditing 'penless' clinic for fallers subsequently set up to generate reports for medical notes and letters for general practitioners. RESULTS: risk-factor identification improved after the insertion of the checklist but remained relatively poor. A dedicated clinic allowed almost complete identification of risk factors. Of the first 112 patients (median age 82) seen in the clinic, 75 (67%) were housebound. Remediable risk factors--e.g. inappropriate medication (67%), unsatisfactory footwear (59%) and postural hypotension (17%)--were found in most. Thirty-three patients (29%) had difficulty with alarm raising. CONCLUSION: ward-based intervention showed limited capacity to identify risk factors for falls: a dedicated clinic was more successful. The use of a portable computer with a programme to screen fallers for risk factors is worthy of consideration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dyer et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: