AIMS: To evaluate urinary incontinence using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), daily pad use, and 24-h pad weight test before and after radical prostatectomy (RP) chronologically, and the correlation between them. METHODS: ICIQ-SF and questions on daily pad use provided subjective, and 24-h pad weight test for objective evaluation. RESULTS: In total, 258 cases were recruited. The continence rate at 12 months after RP was 67% for no pad use, 87% for security 1 pad/day, and 94% for 1 pad/day. The median ICIQ-SF total score before and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after RP was 0, 10, 7, 5, and 4, respectively. Incontinence patterns differed when comparing ICIQ-SF results pre- and post-RP. Significant correlation existed between the ICIQ-SF total score, 24-h pad weight test, and daily pad use; however, point distribution on each scatter plot varied widely. Comparing results before and at 12 months after RP revealed complete recovery for 35% of patients from the ICIQ-SF total score, 67% from daily pad use, and 64% from the 24-h pad weight test. A combination of all 3 showed a recovery of preoperative levels in 29% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: ICIQ-SF was effective and convenient for evaluating UI, including the pattern of UI, after RP. Significant correlation, but wide variations, among ICIQ-SF, daily pad use, and the 24-h pad weight test existed. The best evaluation method would be the one that can compare UI status pre- and post-RP using the ICIQ-SF and 24-h pad weight test.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Machioka et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: