Key result
High socioeconomic disadvantage is linked to ~30% higher in-hospital mortality after high-risk emergency general surgery.
Why the study?
The effect of socioeconomic disadvantage on outcomes after emergency general surgery remains unclear, despite known associations with worse outcomes after elective surgery.
Does high socioeconomic disadvantage increase mortality and adverse outcomes in adults undergoing emergency general surgery?
Cohort (n=103,749)
Yes
Does high socioeconomic disadvantage increase mortality and adverse outcomes in adults undergoing emergency general surgery?
Odds Ratio: 1.3 (95% CI 1.01–1.66)
p-value: p=0.04
Socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with increased in-hospital mortality after high-risk emergency general surgery and higher odds of non-home discharge after low-risk procedures, an effect not mitigated by treatment at level 1 trauma or safety-net hospitals.
May inform risk stratification in emergency general surgery; leaves open whether targeted interventions can mitigate disparities.
BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with worse outcomes after elective surgery, but the effect on emergency general surgery (EGS) remains unclear. We examined the association of socioeconomic disadvantage and outcomes after EGS procedures and investigated whether admission to hospitals with comprehensive clinical and social resources mitigated this effect. METHODS: Adults undergoing 1 of the 10 most burdensome high- and low-risk EGS procedures were identified in six 2014 State Inpatient Databases. Socioeconomic disadvantage was assessed using Area Deprivation Index (ADI) of patient residence. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for patient and hospital factors were used to evaluate the association between ADI quartile (high >75 percentile vs. low <25 percentile), and 30-day readmission, in-hospital mortality, and discharge disposition. Effect modification between ADI and (a) level 1 trauma center and (b) safety-net hospital status was tested. RESULTS: A total of 103,749 patients were analyzed: 72,711 low-risk (70.1%) and 31,038 high-risk procedures (29.9%). Patients from neighborhoods with high socioeconomic disadvantage had a higher proportion with ≥3 comorbidities (41.9% vs. 32.0%), minority race/ethnicity (66.3% vs. 42.4%), and Medicaid (28.8% vs. 14.7%) and were less likely to be treated at level 1 trauma centers (18.3% vs. 27.7%; p < 0.001 for all). Adjusting for competing factors, high socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with increased in-hospital mortality after high-risk procedures (odd ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.66; p = 0.04) and higher odds of non-home discharge (odd ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.30; p = 0.03) for low-risk procedures. Socioeconomic disadvantage was not associated with 30-day readmission for either procedure group. Level 1 trauma status and safety-net hospital did not meaningfully mitigate effect of ADI for any outcome. CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with increased mortality after high-risk procedures and higher odds of non-home discharge after low-risk procedures. This effect was not mitigated by either level 1 trauma or safety-net hospitals. Interventions that specifically address the needs of socially vulnerable communities will be required to significantly improve EGS outcomes for this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiologic, level III.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2022 study conducted a cohort in Emergency general surgery (n=103,749). High socioeconomic disadvantage vs. Low socioeconomic disadvantage was evaluated on In-hospital mortality after high-risk procedures (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.01-1.66, p=0.04). High socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with increased in-hospital mortality after high-risk emergency general surgery (OR 1.30; 95% CI 1.01-1.66; p=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: