The efficiency and cost‐effectiveness of H2O2/UV for the complete decolorization and mineralization of wastewater containing high concentrations of the textile dye Reactive Black 5 was examined. Oxidation until decolorization removed 200–300 mg g−1 of the dissolved organic carbon (DOC). The specific energy consumption was dependent on the initial dye concentration: the higher concentration required a lower specific energy input on a weight basis (160 W h g−1 RB5 for 2.1 g L−1 versus 354 W h g−1 RB5 for 0.5 g L−1). Biodegradable compounds were formed, so that DOC removal could be increased by 30% in a following biological stage. However, in order to attain 800 mg g−1 overall mineralization, 500 mg g−1 of the DOC had to be oxidized in the H2O2/UV stage. A cost analysis showed that although the capital costs are much less for a H2O2/UV stage compared to ozonation, the operating costs are almost double those of ozonation. Thus, while H2O2/UV can compete with ozonation when the treatment goal only requires decolorization, ozonation is more cost‐effective in this case when mineralization is desired.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
El-Dein et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: