Key result
Downsampling PPG to 60 Hz maintains waveform stability, but lower rates cause considerable fluctuation.
Why the study?
Photoplethysmogram waveform features are typically acquired at high sampling rates, but the feasibility and performance of using low sampling rate measurements for clinical applications remain unclear.
Can photoplethysmogram waveform features measured at low sampling rates be used comparably to those measured at 240 Hz in healthy male subjects?
Can photoplethysmogram waveform features measured at low sampling rates be used comparably to those measured at 240 Hz in healthy male subjects?
Evaluates the feasibility of using low sampling rate PPGs for waveform feature extraction, which could reduce computational and power demands for wearable devices.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports 60 Hz PPG sampling for waveform features in wearables; leaves open validation in clinical populations and real-world settings.
To date, the applications of photoplethysmograms in the estimation of cuff-less blood pressure, arteriosclerosis, and so on have been studied. Photoplethysmogram waveform features have often been used to estimate the target volumes. For these estimations, it is necessary to acquire photoplethysmogram waveforms and changes in their derivative waveform details, for which the photoplethysmograms measured at comparatively high sampling rates have been used. The performance of smartphone cameras and wearable photoplethysmogram sensors has improved; with regard to mobile health technology, photoplethysmograms measured at lower sampling rates offer considerable advantages. These include lower computational resources, compression of accumulated data, and lower sensor power consumption. However, compared to photoplethysmograms measured at a high sampling rate, photoplethysmogram measurement at a low sampling rate will result in waveform signal degradation. This paper investigates the possibility of using photoplethysmograms measured at a low sampling rate. To this end, we statistically compared photoplethysmogram waveform features obtained from 63 male subjects free of circulatory diseases, at a sampling rate of 240 Hz, with waveform features obtained at low sampling rates (120, 60, 30, 20, and 10 Hz) through downsampling, and evaluated possible commercial use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fujita et al. (2019) studied Healthy (free of circulatory diseases) (n=63). Low sampling rates (120, 60, 30, 20, and 10 Hz) vs. 240 Hz sampling rate was evaluated on Fluctuation of PPG waveform features. Photoplethysmogram waveform features showed little fluctuation when downsampled from 240 Hz to 60 Hz, suggesting commercial usability at 60 Hz, whereas lower sampling rates resulted in considerable fluctuation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: